Over-evolution #1

One interpretation where technology like AI and social media have gone so far where it suddenly evolved faster than tribal evolution or Darwinism. This is mostly true; it seems like progress accelerates exponentially every year, and old-fashioned immediate reward systems, for instance, killing an animal to feast on, are used against us, for instance, in short-form video.

Over-evolution #2

Another interpretation is from Peter Wessel Zapffe, where he says that human psychology is too conscious for its own good! I also consider this to be true; humans are probably the only self-aware beings. Their lives may also be made way too complex, compared to other animals, that can just live mindlessly. Sadly, even if you try to suppress your thoughts, unless you are very trained in things like stoicism or asceticism, it rarely helps, and it consumes lots of energy for little gain!

His "counters" (coping mechanisms)

Isolation: ignorance of the thoughts
Anchoring: Fixing onto values like family or God
Distraction: Focus on the external world
Sublimation: Turning the pain into a philosophy, a work of "art".

My views

Number 1 is just psychological isolation and negligence, and the thoughts would come back again and again if suppressed, so it is bad.
Number 2 is just unnecessary, doesn't actually address the problems whatsoever, and poses an additional risk: What if the value is broken? (God may not exist, and you might not get the career you want)
Number 3 is the same thing: playing video games doesn’t actually help with academics! Distraction can interfere with daily life and its goals!
Number 4 helps psychologically, even if irrational, as you can find out and de-burden the brain of thoughts about other things, so I would recommend that one. Finding time to do incremental writing may transform the awareness of the self, which is the opposite of number 1, so it's good!

Category:Biology Category:Psychology