Philosophy vs sociology vs biology

Human biology: Darwinism is rooted in ancient times, animal hunting, living in tribes, and where survival was the main goal, and through this, evolution has granted many things, but the biggest thing of all is a strong force to survive (as those without that force failed to pass on their genes)
Yet in a modern world, the danger to humans is lowered, yet stress signals that shouldn’t be that strong impact the ability to do deep thinking, and humans have lost things in evolution, and now businesses and social media sites are using human biology against humans.
Social standards pretty much are a collection of what the tribes of humans have collectively agreed on or evolved into agreeing. However, some of them are just suggestions, and some of them aren’t even philosophically valid. In fact, philosophers make up the minority of the population so they barely impact social standards; plus, they themselves are often called outliers and weirdos by society itself for being different than what human biology and social standards suggest.
Philosophical validity is often distinct from social consensus because the former relies on internal consistency and logical proofs, while the latter relies on utility and group cohesion.

Category:Philosophy Category:Sociology Category:Biology