How pragmatically useful is the philosophy] of Absurdism?

Assume a logically correct and totally detached being. That being would have thought that all meaning was coping, so nihilism is correct. However, nothingness is a separate domain that a human mind cannot comprehend. Yet Darwinism evolution made it such that a human has a very strong Will to live, so the human will:
1. Biologically Live
2. keep wondering: if meaninglessness was REALLY the case, why did humans exist even through all the troubles of modern society?

Thus, Absurdism explicitly is to suit the brain: even though the meaning is abstract or non-existent by its truism, one must live through it. There is no way to REBEL BRAIN PSYCHOLOGY by another truism. Rather, there is even less point to try to REBEL LIFE itself with Death. There is no more, but to live.

Category:Albert Camus Category:Philosophy